This analytical opinion piece discusses how the prevailing 'hybrid war' framework used by European policymakers and strategists constrains their ability to counter Russian sabotage effectively. The author argues that Russia employs a broad array of disruptive tactics that often do not fit neatly under the existing hybrid war definitions, including interference in critical infrastructure, political destabilization, information operations, and economic pressures. The article stresses the need for Europe to move beyond rigid categorizations and develop more flexible, scenario-based strategies and coordinated policy responses. It warns that failure to adapt risks leaving the continent vulnerable to ongoing Russian interference and sabotage campaigns that exploit institutional blind spots and systemic weaknesses.

This analytical opinion piece discusses how the prevailing 'hybrid war' framework used by European policymakers and strategists constrains their ability to counter Russian sabotage effectively. The author argues that Russia employs a broad array of disruptive tactics that often do not fit neatly under the existing hybrid war definitions, including interference in critical infrastructure, political destabilization, information operations, and economic pressures. The article stresses the need for Europe to move beyond rigid categorizations and develop more flexible, scenario-based strategies and coordinated policy responses. It warns that failure to adapt risks leaving the continent vulnerable to ongoing Russian interference and sabotage campaigns that exploit institutional blind spots and systemic weaknesses.